The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Mats Lindeskog

Postdoctoral fellow

Default user image.

Ensembles of ecosystem service models can improve accuracy and indicate uncertainty

Author

  • Simon Willcock
  • Danny A.P. Hooftman
  • Ryan Blanchard
  • Terence P. Dawson
  • Thomas Hickler
  • Mats Lindeskog
  • Javier Martinez-Lopez
  • Belinda Reyers
  • Sophie M. Watts
  • Felix Eigenbrod
  • James M. Bullock
Show all

Summary, in English

Many ecosystem services (ES) models exist to support sustainable development decisions. However, most ES studies use only a single modelling framework and, because of a lack of validation data, rarely assess model accuracy for the study area. In line with other research themes which have high model uncertainty, such as climate change, ensembles of ES models may better serve decision-makers by providing more robust and accurate estimates, as well as provide indications of uncertainty when validation data are not available. To illustrate the benefits of an ensemble approach, we highlight the variation between alternative models, demonstrating that there are large geographic regions where decisions based on individual models are not robust. We test if ensembles are more accurate by comparing the ensemble accuracy of multiple models for six ES against validation data across sub-Saharan Africa with the accuracy of individual models. We find that ensembles are better predictors of ES, being 5.0–6.1% more accurate than individual models. We also find that the uncertainty (i.e. variation among constituent models) of the model ensemble is negatively correlated with accuracy and so can be used as a proxy for accuracy when validation is not possible (e.g. in data-deficient areas or when developing scenarios). Since ensembles are more robust, accurate and convey uncertainty, we recommend that ensemble modelling should be more widely implemented within ES science to better support policy choices and implementation.

Department/s

  • Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2020

Language

English

Publication/Series

Science of the Total Environment

Volume

747

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Environmental Sciences

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Carbon
  • Charcoal
  • Firewood
  • Grazing
  • Model validation
  • Natural capital
  • Poverty alleviation
  • Sustainable development
  • Water

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0048-9697