The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Alex Vermeulen

Alex Vermeulen

Manager

Portrait of Alex Vermeulen

Top-down estimates of European CH4 and N2O emissions based on four different inverse models

Author

  • P. Bergamaschi
  • M. Corazza
  • Ute Karstens
  • M. Athanassiadou
  • R.L. Thompson
  • I. Pison
  • A.J. Manning
  • P. Bousquet
  • A. Segers
  • Alex Vermeulen
  • G. Janssens-Maenhout
  • M. Schmidt
  • M. Ramonet
  • F. Meinhardt
  • T. Aalto
  • L. Haszpra
  • J. Moncrieff
  • M.E. Popa
  • D. Lowry
  • M. Steinbacher
  • A. Jordan
  • S. O'Doherty
  • S. Piacentino
  • E. Dlugokencky
Show all

Summary, in English

European CH4 and N2O emissions are estimated for 2006 and 2007 using four independent inverse modelling systems, based on different global and regional Eulerian and Lagrangian transport models. This ensemble approach is designed to provide more realistic estimates of the overall uncertainties in the derived emissions, which is particularly important for verifying bottom-up emission inventories. We use continuous observations from 10 European stations (including five tall towers) for CH4 and 9 continuous stations for N2O, complemented by additional European and global flask sampling sites. The available observations mainly constrain CH4 and N2O emissions from north-western and eastern Europe. The inversions are strongly driven by the observations and the derived total emissions of larger countries show little dependence on the emission inventories used a priori. Three inverse models yield 26–56% higher total CH4 emissions from north-western and eastern Europe compared to bottom-up emissions reported to the UNFCCC, while one model is close to the UNFCCC values. In contrast, the inverse modelling estimates of European N2O emissions are in general close to the UNFCCC values, with the overall range from all models being much smaller than the UNFCCC uncertainty range for most countries. Our analysis suggests that the reported uncertainties for CH4 emissions might be underestimated, while those for N2O emissions are likely overestimated.

Publishing year

2015

Language

English

Pages

715-736

Publication/Series

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Volume

15

Issue

2

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Copernicus GmbH

Topic

  • Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1680-7324