Menu

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

Estimation of absorbed PAR across Scandinavia from satellite measurements. Part II: modeling and evaluating the fractional absorption.

Author:
  • Pontus Olofsson
  • Lars Eklundh
Publishing year: 2007
Language: English
Pages: 240-251
Publication/Series: Remote Sensing of Environment
Volume: 110
Issue: 2
Document type: Journal article
Publisher: Elsevier

Abstract english

The aim of this study is to generate a quality-controlled sub-kilometer dataset of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) across Scandinavia from satellite. FAPAR is required for estimating the amount of PAR absorbed (APAR) by vegetation, which in turn allows for estimation of carbon uptake. In this study, FA-PAR was modeled from normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) which was obtained from the MODIS VI product(MOD13Q1) at 250 m spatial resolution. Modeled FAPAR was evaluated against in-situ measurements of fractional interception of PAR (FIPAR) and FAPAR at nine plots in six forested sites across Sweden and Denmark from 2001 to 2005. High resolution remote sensing data were used to investigate the representativeness of the measurement areas. Furthermore, FAPAR from the MODIS LAI/FPAR product at 1 km spatial resolution (MOD 15A2) was investigated and compared the measured and modeled FAPAR. There was good agreement between modeled and measured FAPAR (6.9% average RMSE of the means). A linear relationship between daily values of NDVI and FAPAR was found (R-2=0.82), and it is concluded that seasonally adjusted NDVI can be used for accurate FAPAR estimations over forested areas in Scandinavia. However, it was found that the error was correlated with average FAPAR and that it is important to take the understory vegetation into account when measuring FAPAR in open canopies. The observed difference between FIPAR and FAPAR was 2.3 and 1.4 percentage units for coniferous and deciduous stands, respectively. MODIS FAPAR performed well although a few unrealistic values were present, highlighting the necessity to filter out low quality values using the quality-control datasets.

Keywords

  • Physical Geography
  • FAPAR
  • MODIS
  • FIPAR
  • PPFD
  • PAR
  • NPP
  • Scandinavia
  • forest

Other

Published
  • remote sensing-lup-obsolete
  • ISSN: 0034-4257
E-mail: lars [dot] eklundh [at] nateko [dot] lu [dot] se

Professor

Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science

+46 46 222 96 55

454

16

Teaching staff

Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science

16

Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
Lund University
Sölvegatan 12
S-223 62 Lund
Sweden

Processing of personal data

Accessibility statement