The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

David Wårlind

Researcher

Default user image.

Comparing machine learning-derived global estimates of soil respiration and its components with those from terrestrial ecosystem models

Author

  • Haibo Lu
  • Shihua Li
  • Minna Ma
  • Vladislav Bastrikov
  • Xiuzhi Chen
  • Philippe Ciais
  • Yongjiu Dai
  • Akihiko Ito
  • Weimin Ju
  • Sebastian Lienert
  • Danica Lombardozzi
  • Xingjie Lu
  • Fabienne Maignan
  • Mahdi Nakhavali
  • Timothy Quine
  • Andreas Schindlbacher
  • Jun Wang
  • Yingping Wang
  • David W rlind
  • Shupeng Zhang
  • Wenping Yuan
Show all

Summary, in English

The CO2 efflux from soil (soil respiration (SR)) is one of the largest fluxes in the global carbon (C) cycle and its response to climate change could strongly influence future atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Still, a large divergence of global SR estimates and its autotrophic (AR) and heterotrophic (HR) components exists among process based terrestrial ecosystem models. Therefore, alternatively derived global benchmark values are warranted for constraining the various ecosystem model output. In this study, we developed models based on the global soil respiration database (version 5.0), using the random forest (RF) method to generate the global benchmark distribution of total SR and its components. Benchmark values were then compared with the output of ten different global terrestrial ecosystem models. Our observationally derived global mean annual benchmark rates were 85.5 ± 40.4 (SD) Pg C yr-1 for SR, 50.3 ± 25.0 (SD) Pg C yr-1 for HR and 35.2 Pg C yr-1 for AR during 1982-2012, respectively. Evaluating against the observations, the RF models showed better performance in both of SR and HR simulations than all investigated terrestrial ecosystem models. Large divergences in simulating SR and its components were observed among the terrestrial ecosystem models. The estimated global SR and HR by the ecosystem models ranged from 61.4 to 91.7 Pg C yr-1 and 39.8 to 61.7 Pg C yr-1, respectively. The most discrepancy lays in the estimation of AR, the difference (12.0-42.3 Pg C yr-1) of estimates among the ecosystem models was up to 3.5 times. The contribution of AR to SR highly varied among the ecosystem models ranging from 18% to 48%, which differed with the estimate by RF (41%). This study generated global SR and its components (HR and AR) fluxes, which are useful benchmarks to constrain the performance of terrestrial ecosystem models.

Department/s

  • Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
  • eSSENCE: The e-Science Collaboration
  • MERGE: ModElling the Regional and Global Earth system

Publishing year

2021-05

Language

English

Publication/Series

Environmental Research Letters

Volume

16

Issue

5

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Topic

  • Physical Geography

Keywords

  • benchmark
  • carbon cycling
  • global soil respiration
  • machine learning
  • terrestrial ecosystem models

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1748-9318