Webbläsaren som du använder stöds inte av denna webbplats. Alla versioner av Internet Explorer stöds inte längre, av oss eller Microsoft (läs mer här: * https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Var god och använd en modern webbläsare för att ta del av denna webbplats, som t.ex. nyaste versioner av Edge, Chrome, Firefox eller Safari osv.

Default user image.

Mats Lindeskog

Postdoc

Default user image.

Ensembles of ecosystem service models can improve accuracy and indicate uncertainty

Författare

  • Simon Willcock
  • Danny A.P. Hooftman
  • Ryan Blanchard
  • Terence P. Dawson
  • Thomas Hickler
  • Mats Lindeskog
  • Javier Martinez-Lopez
  • Belinda Reyers
  • Sophie M. Watts
  • Felix Eigenbrod
  • James M. Bullock
Visa allt

Summary, in English

Many ecosystem services (ES) models exist to support sustainable development decisions. However, most ES studies use only a single modelling framework and, because of a lack of validation data, rarely assess model accuracy for the study area. In line with other research themes which have high model uncertainty, such as climate change, ensembles of ES models may better serve decision-makers by providing more robust and accurate estimates, as well as provide indications of uncertainty when validation data are not available. To illustrate the benefits of an ensemble approach, we highlight the variation between alternative models, demonstrating that there are large geographic regions where decisions based on individual models are not robust. We test if ensembles are more accurate by comparing the ensemble accuracy of multiple models for six ES against validation data across sub-Saharan Africa with the accuracy of individual models. We find that ensembles are better predictors of ES, being 5.0–6.1% more accurate than individual models. We also find that the uncertainty (i.e. variation among constituent models) of the model ensemble is negatively correlated with accuracy and so can be used as a proxy for accuracy when validation is not possible (e.g. in data-deficient areas or when developing scenarios). Since ensembles are more robust, accurate and convey uncertainty, we recommend that ensemble modelling should be more widely implemented within ES science to better support policy choices and implementation.

Avdelning/ar

  • Institutionen för naturgeografi och ekosystemvetenskap
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publiceringsår

2020

Språk

Engelska

Publikation/Tidskrift/Serie

Science of the Total Environment

Volym

747

Dokumenttyp

Artikel i tidskrift

Förlag

Elsevier

Ämne

  • Environmental Sciences

Nyckelord

  • Africa
  • Carbon
  • Charcoal
  • Firewood
  • Grazing
  • Model validation
  • Natural capital
  • Poverty alleviation
  • Sustainable development
  • Water

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Övrigt

  • ISSN: 0048-9697