The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Markku Rummukainen

Professor

Default user image.

Communication and use of climate scenarios for climate change adaptation in Finland, Sweden and Norway

Author

  • Karoliina Pilli-Sihvola
  • Bob van Oort
  • Inger Hanssen-Bauer
  • Markku Ollikainen
  • Markku Rummukainen
  • Heikki Tuomenvirta

Summary, in English

This paper assesses the communication and the use of climate scenarios at the science–science and science–policy interface in Finland, Sweden and Norway. It is based on document analysis and stakeholder questionnaires. The questionnaires targeted three stakeholder groups, all engaged in the communication and the use of climate scenario information: climate scenario producers; impact, adaptation and vulnerability (IAV) experts; and policy-makers. The respondents were asked to identify issues associated with the communication of scenarios and other needs pertaining to the usefulness and availability of such information. Despite the relatively long history of climate change adaptation in the three countries, climate scenarios are not utilised to their full potential. Climate scenarios have been used in awareness raising, problem understanding and strategy development. However, far less examples can be found on adaptation actions, particularly on harnessing the benefits of climate change. The communication between climate scenario producers and IAV experts functions well; however, communication between climate researchers and policy-makers is less efficient. Each country has developed boundary services to enhance dissemination of the climate scenario information to policy-makers. They are cost-efficient but do not necessarily enhance the comprehension of the information and encourage the actual dialogue between scenario producers and the end-users. Further translation of scenario information to impact and vulnerability estimates together with established boundary work could improve the use of climate research information. As adaptation policy in these countries further progresses towards implementation, there are increasing expectations of support from research, further challenging the communication of climate scenarios.

Department/s

  • Centre for Environmental and Climate Science (CEC)
  • MERGE: ModElling the Regional and Global Earth system

Publishing year

2015-04-03

Language

English

Pages

510-524

Publication/Series

Local Environment

Volume

20

Issue

4

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Routledge

Topic

  • Peace and Conflict Studies

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • climate scenarios
  • communication
  • dissemination
  • science–policy interface

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1354-9839