The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Markku Rummukainen

Professor

Default user image.

Short communication : Environmental consequences of alternative practices for intensifying crop production

Author

  • P. J. Gregory
  • J. S.I. Ingram
  • R. Andersson
  • R. A. Betts
  • V. Brovkin
  • T. N. Chase
  • P. R. Grace
  • A. J. Gray
  • N. Hamilton
  • T. B. Hardy
  • S. M. Howden
  • A. Jenkins
  • M. Meybeck
  • M. Olsson
  • I. Ortiz-Monasterio
  • C. A. Palm
  • T. W. Payn
  • M. Rummukainen
  • R. E. Schulze
  • M. Thiem
  • C. Valentin
  • M. J. Wilkinson

Summary, in English

The increasing global demand for food will be met chiefly by increased intensification of production. For crops, this will be achieved largely by increased yields per area with a smaller contribution from an increased number of crops grown in a seasonal cycle. Production systems show a spectrum of intensification practices characterised by varying methods of site preparation and pest control, and inputs of germplasm, nutrients and water. This paper highlights three main types of intensification (based largely on the quantity and efficiency of use of external inputs) and examines both the on- and off-site environmental consequences of each for soils, water quantity and quality, and climate forcing and regional climate change. The use of low amounts of external inputs is generally regarded as being the most environmentally-benign although this advantage over systems with higher inputs may disappear if the consequences are expressed per unit of product rather than per unit area. The adverse effects of production systems with high external inputs, especially losses of nutrients from fertilisers and manures to water courses and contributions of gases to climate forcing, have been quantified. Future intensification, including the use of improved germplasm via genetic modification, will seek to increase the efficiency of use of added inputs while minimising adverse effects on the environment. However, reducing the loss of nutrients from fertilisers and manures, and increasing the efficiency of water utilisation in crop production, remain considerable challenges.

Publishing year

2002

Language

English

Pages

279-290

Publication/Series

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volume

88

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Keywords

  • Climate forcing
  • Environmental degradation
  • Global change
  • Intensification

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0167-8809