Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

Does canopy mean nitrogen concentration explain variation in canopy light use efficiency across 14 contrasting forest sites?

  • Mikko Peltoniemi
  • Minna Pulkkinen
  • Pasi Kolari
  • Remko A. Duursma
  • Leonardo Montagnani
  • Sonia Wharton
  • Fredrik Lagergren
  • Kentaro Takagi
  • Hans Verbeeck
  • Torben Christensen
  • Timo Vesala
  • Matthias Falk
  • Denis Loustau
  • Annikki Makela
Publishing year: 2012
Language: English
Pages: 200-218
Publication/Series: Tree Physiology
Volume: 32
Issue: 2
Document type: Journal article
Publisher: Oxford University Press

Abstract english

The maximum light use efficiency (LUE = gross primary production (GPP)/absorbed photosynthetic photon flux density (aPPFD)) of plant canopies has been reported to vary spatially and some of this variation has previously been attributed to plant species differences. The canopy nitrogen concentration [N] can potentially explain some of this spatial variation. However, the current paradigm of the N-effect on photosynthesis is largely based on the relationship between photosynthetic capacity (A(max)) and [N], i.e., the effects of [N] on photosynthesis rates appear under high PPFD. A maximum LUE-[N] relationship, if it existed, would influence photosynthesis in the whole range of PPFD. We estimated maximum LUE for 14 eddy-covariance forest sites, examined its [N] dependency and investigated how the [N]-maximum LUE dependency could be incorporated into a GPP model. In the model, maximum LUE corresponds to LUE under optimal environmental conditions before light saturation takes place (the slope of GPP vs. PPFD under low PPFD). Maximum LUE was higher in deciduous/mixed than in coniferous sites, and correlated significantly with canopy mean [N]. Correlations between maximum LUE and canopy [N] existed regardless of daily PPFD, although we expected the correlation to disappear under low PPFD when LUE was also highest. Despite these correlations, including [N] in the model of GPP only marginally decreased the root mean squared error. Our results suggest that maximum LUE correlates linearly with canopy [N], but that a larger body of data is required before we can include this relationship into a GPP model. Gross primary production will therefore positively correlate with [N] already at low PPFD, and not only at high PPFD as is suggested by the prevailing paradigm of leaf-level A(max)-[N] relationships. This finding has consequences for modelling GPP driven by temporal changes or spatial variation in canopy [N].


  • Physical Geography
  • canopy nitrogen concentration
  • eddy covariance
  • gross primary
  • production
  • light use efficiency
  • quantum yield
  • vegetation productivity


  • ISSN: 1758-4469
E-mail: fredrik [dot] lagergren [at] nateko [dot] lu [dot] se


Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science

+46 46 222 39 76



Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
Lund University
Sölvegatan 12
S-223 62 Lund

Processing of personal data

Accessibility statement