The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Default user image.

Anna Maria Jönsson

Professor

Default user image.

Modelled C and N2O fluxes and emission factors

Author

  • Anna Maria Jönsson
  • Angela Fiore
  • Fredrik Lagergren
  • Tanya Lippmann
  • Mattias Lundblad
  • Kim Naudts
  • Hans Petersson
  • Yanzi Yan
  • Lorella Mariani
  • Eleonora Di Cristofaro

Summary, in English

The aim of Task 4.1 is to derive emission factors based on bottom-up land surface modelling, using two process-based dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs), LPJ-GUESS and ORCHIDEE. In recent years, emission factors have been proposed as a useful methodology for estimating greenhouse gas emissions under different land-management strategies. Whilst emission factors are straightforward to implement and offer several practical advantages, conventional emission factors do not account for climatic variability (e.g., increased runoff following heavy precipitation in a wet year may reduce N₂O emissions) or spatial heterogeneity (differences in soil properties also impact CO2 and N2O emissions). To investigate the extent to which incorporating spatially and temporally explicit processes improves the robustness of GHG emission estimates, we assess the added value of representing spatial and temporal variability associated with land management and extreme weather events using two case studies: carbon emissions from forestry in Sweden and nitrogen emissions from agriculture in Italy. Model simulations were evaluated against available observational data. The simulations demonstrated the usefulness of DGVMs for estimating spatial and temporal changes in carbon stock (forest in Sweden) and N2O emissions (agriculture in Italy), as influenced by weather and climate extremes and different management methods. The model comparison revealed that uncertainties in model parameterization can significantly affect simulation outcome, highlighting the need for further model development, calibration, and evaluation.

Department/s

  • Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences (MGeo)
  • LU Profile Area: Nature-based future solutions
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate
  • Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science

Publishing year

2025

Language

English

Document type

Report

Publisher

The AVENGERS project

Topic

  • Physical Geography

Status

Published

Project

  • Attributing and verifying european and national greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions and reconciliation with statistical bottom up estimates